<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Workbench	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.woodlogger.com/workbench/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.woodlogger.com/workbench/</link>
	<description>Adventures of an American Woodworker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 03:46:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Alan in NJ		</title>
		<link>https://www.woodlogger.com/workbench/comment-page-1/#comment-3497</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan in NJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 05:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodlogger.com/?p=849#comment-3497</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Your write-up says the legs were built with 2 x 6s, but the last pic looks like the top frame is made from 2 x 6s and the legs are 2 x 4s. With your BOM indicating only (2) pieces of 2 x 6 x 8&#039;, there would not be enough to make the top frame and the legs.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your write-up says the legs were built with 2 x 6s, but the last pic looks like the top frame is made from 2 x 6s and the legs are 2 x 4s. With your BOM indicating only (2) pieces of 2 x 6 x 8&#8242;, there would not be enough to make the top frame and the legs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
